Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 21, ISSUE 3, P156-159, September 2010

Endoscopic inferior meatal antrostomy

      An inferior maxillary sinus antrostomy is useful for several reasons. In patients with open medial antrostomies who are having persistent infections a secondary cilial dysfunction may be present. An inferior antrostomy provides an alternate pathway of drainage allowing the cilia to become functional. It also helps for polyp disease, thick secretions, large retention cysts, maxillary related choanal polyps or fungal disease removal. It gives better exposure to the floor and anterior maxillary sinus. The use of an medial based nasal flap which can be elevated prior to the antrostomy enhances healing if a larger permanent window is desired. The window can be made small, if temporary, or large, if permanent, as is necessary.

      Keywords

      Currently, disease of the paranasal sinuses is addressed with an emphasis on restoring mucocilliary clearance via native drainage pathways; hence, the term functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Since the late 1980s, proponents of functional endoscopic sinus surgery eschewed the creation of an inferior maxillary antrostomy due to concerns about mucocilliary recirculation, as well as needless destruction of functional mucosa.
      • Kennedy D.W.
      • Shaalan H.
      Reevaluation of maxillary sinus surgery: experimental study in rabbits.
      Despite these concerns, normal in vivo mucocilliary clearance has been demonstrated in patients following inferior meatal antrostomy.
      • Ochi K.
      • Sugiura N.
      • Komatsuzaki Y.
      • et al.
      Patency of inferior meatal antrostomy.
      In the vast majority of cases for chronic rhinosinusitis, we perform a middle antrostomy, opening the natural ostium. However, in patients without functional mucocilliary clearance, such as in Kartagener's syndrome, cystic fibrosis, or even secondary cilliary dysfunction due to chronic sinus disease, gravity-dependent drainage facilitated by an inferior meatal antrostomy may be of benefit.
      • Yanagisawa E.
      • Joe J.
      Inferior meatal antrostomy: is it still indicated?.
      Additionally, an inferior meatal antrostomy aids in the removal of maxillary sinus disease, including mycetomas, thick secretions, antrochoanal polyps, and allergic fungal disease. Last, an inferior meatal antrostomy greatly improves visualization of the floor and anterior wall of the maxillary sinus and can be useful for postoperative surveillance via flexible endoscope.

      Details of procedure

      The nose is decongested preoperatively with 2 to 3 sprays of oxymetazoline per nostril. After intubation, a throat pack is placed. The inferior turbinates and septum are then injected with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, taking care to aspirate before injection. Four percent cocaine pledgets are then placed along the nasal floor while the operative field is prepared.
      Under 0° rigid endoscopic visualization, a Freer elevator is passed into the inferior meatus and the inferior turbinate is up fractured, mobilizing the turbinate so it is perpendicular to the nasal floor (Fig. 1). This maneuver is key to adequate visualization, greatly simplifying the remainder of the procedure. At this point, Hasner's valve, located at the junction of the anterior and middle third of the lateral nasal wall, is identified (Figs. 2 and 3).
      • Lund V.J.
      Inferior meatal antrostomy: fundamental considerations of design and function.
      A 90° curved J-curette is used to puncture the lateral nasal wall approximately 1 cm posterior to Hasner's valve, midway between the nasal floor and the genu of the inferior turbinate (Figs. 4 and 5). After an adequate opening has been created, a universal downbiter is introduced and the antrostomy is extended inferiorly, down to the nasal floor (Figs. 6 and 7). The antrostomy may be enlarged in an anterior–posterior plane with a variety of cutting instruments or punch forceps. A curved suction is then introduced into the antrostomy and the maxillary sinus and its contents are easily visualized with a 30° rigid endoscope (Figs. 8 and 9). If the inferior meatal antrostomy has been performed only to facilitate removal of maxillary sinus contents (ie, mycetoma or inspissated secretions), then the antrostomy is enlarged as necessary to allow safe removal (Fig. 10). If a middle antrostomy is performed, a 30°, 45°, or 70° scope can be introduced into the middle antrostomy, while a 40° microdebrider is introduced into the inferior meatal antrostomy, providing excellent endoscopic exposure and allowing debridement or removal of the maxillary sinus contents or vigorous irrigation. For patients requiring gravity-dependent drainage, we typically remove the portion of inferior turbinate opposing the antrostomy to prevent subsequent closure. If a middle antrostomy has been performed during a previous surgery, joining the middle and inferior antrostomy prevents recirculation phenomenon (Figs. 11 and 12). Blood loss for the procedure is typically minimal and postoperative packing is typically unnecessary. At the completion of the case, absorbable oxidized cellulose soaked in triamcinolone is laid across the wound bed to encourage hemostasis. An inferior medial based flap extending to the floor of the nose can be fashioned endoscopically prior to making the antrostomy. This flap is folded into the antrostomy at the end of surgery enhancing healing and patency. Figure 10 outlines area of flap creation as well.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Inferior meatus (Hasner's valve outlined in black). (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Inferior meatus (Hasner's valve visible at 9 o'clock).
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3Location of antrostomy. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Figure 4Puncturing lateral nasal wall with J curette.
      Figure thumbnail gr5
      Figure 5Puncturing lateral nasal wall. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr7
      Figure 7Introducing universal downbiter. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr8
      Figure 8Completed antrostomy. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr9
      Figure 9View of maxillary sinus. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Figure thumbnail gr10
      Figure 10Completed antrostomy. (Dotted lines indicate potential area of enlargement as indicated.)
      Figure thumbnail gr11
      Figure 11Previous middle antrostomy joined with inferior antrostomy.
      Figure thumbnail gr12
      Figure 12Cystic fibrosis patient with prior middle antrostomy joined with inferior antrostomy (8 weeks after surgery). (Color version of figure is available online.)

      Conclusions

      While rare, indications for an inferior meatal antrostomy continue to exist, despite the widespread application of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Indications include mucocilliary dysfunction, maxillary sinus disease not easily addressed with a middle antrostomy, and improved visualization of the anterior maxillary wall and floor. The procedure is safe and relatively simple to perform.An inferior medial based flap extending to the floor of the nose can be fashioned endoscopically prior to making the antrostomy. This flap is folded into the antrostomy at the end of surgery enhancing healing and patency. Figure 10 outlines area of flap creation as well.

      References

        • Kennedy D.W.
        • Shaalan H.
        Reevaluation of maxillary sinus surgery: experimental study in rabbits.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989; 98: 901-906
        • Ochi K.
        • Sugiura N.
        • Komatsuzaki Y.
        • et al.
        Patency of inferior meatal antrostomy.
        Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003; 20: S57-S60
        • Yanagisawa E.
        • Joe J.
        Inferior meatal antrostomy: is it still indicated?.
        Ear Nose Throat J. 1997; 76: 368-370
        • Lund V.J.
        Inferior meatal antrostomy: fundamental considerations of design and function.
        J Laryngol Otol. 1998; 112: 36-40