Outcomes measures for patients with facial nerve injury

      There are more surgical and medical options for treating patients with facial nerve injury than ever before. However, little high-quality outcomes research has been performed comparing these different interventions. Fortunately, there are a number of well-validated outcomes measures available to evaluate patients with facial nerve injury. This manuscript categorizes and summarizes these tools.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • House J.W.
        Facial nerve grading systems.
        Laryngoscope. 1983; 93: 1056-1069
        • Botman J.W.
        • Jongkees L.B.
        The results of intratemporal treatment of facial palsy.
        Pract Otorhinolaryngol. 1956; 17: 80-100
        • May M.
        Facial paralysis, peripheral type: A proposed method of reporting.
        Laryngoscope. 1970; 80: 331-390
        • Pietersen E.
        Spontaneous course of Bell's palsy.
        in: Fisch U. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976. Kugler Medical Publications, Amstelveen, The Netherlands1977: 337-343
        • Adour K.K.
        • Swanson Jr, P.J.
        Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy.
        Trans Am Acad Opthlamol Otolaryngol. 1971; 75: 1284-1301
        • Janssen F.P.
        Over de postoperatieve facialis-verlamming [Thesis].
        University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands1963
        • Yanagihara N.
        Grading of facial palsy.
        in: Fisch U. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International, Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976. Kugler Medical Publications, Amstelveen, The Netherlands1977: 533-535
        • Stennert E.
        Facial nerve paralysis scoring system.
        in: Fisch U. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976. Kugler Medical Publications, Amstelveen, The Netherlands1977: 543-547
        • Linstrom C.J.
        Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction.
        Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 1129-1147
        • House J.W.
        • Brackmann D.E.
        Facial nerve grading system.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985; 93: 146-147
        • Yen T.L.
        • Driscoll C.L.
        • Lalwani A.K.
        Significance of house-Brackmann facial nerve grading global score in the setting of differential facial nerve function.
        Otol Neurotol. 2003; 24: 118-122
        • Reitzen S.D.
        • Babb J.S.
        • Lalwani A.K.
        Significance and reliability of the house-Brackmann grading system for regional facial nerve function.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140: 154-158
        • Vrabec J.T.
        • Backous D.D.
        • et al.
        • Facial Nerve Disorders Committee
        Facial nerve grading system 2.0.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140: 445-450
        • Coulson S.E.
        • Croxson G.R.
        • Adams R.D.
        • et al.
        Reliability of the “Sydney,” “Sunnybrook,” and “House-Brackmann” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132: 543-549
        • Ross B.G.
        • Fradet G.
        • Nedzelski J.M.
        Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996; 114: 380-386
        • Kayhan F.T.
        • Zurakowski D.
        • Rauch S.D.
        Toronto facial grading system: interobserver reliability.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122: 212-215
        • de Ru J.A.
        • Braunius W.W.
        • van Benthem P.P.
        • et al.
        Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed.
        Otol Neurotol. 2006; 27: 1030-1036
        • Burres S.A.
        Facial biomechanics: the standards of normal.
        Laryngoscope. 1985; 95: 708-714
        • Croxson G.
        • May M.
        • Mester S.J.
        Grading facial nerve function: house-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods.
        Am J Otol. 1990; 11: 240-246
        • Manktelow R.T.
        • Zuker R.M.
        • Tomat L.R.
        Facial paralysis measurement with a handheld ruler.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 435-443
        • Isono M.
        • Murata K.
        • Tanaka H.
        • et al.
        An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996; 114: 27-31
        • Tomat L.R.
        • Manktelow R.T.
        Evaluation of a new measurement tool for facial paralysis reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 696-704
        • Kang Y.S.
        • Bae Y.C.
        • Hwang S.M.
        • et al.
        A simple and quantitative method for three-dimensional measurement of normal smiles.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 54: 379-383
        • Gross M.M.
        • Trotman C.A.
        • Moffatt K.S.
        A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion.
        Angle Orthod. 1996; 66: 189-194
        • Wachtman G.S.
        • Cohn J.F.
        • VanSwearingen J.M.
        • et al.
        Automated tracking of facial features in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1124-1133
        • Neely J.G.
        • Cheung J.Y.
        • Wood M.
        • et al.
        Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face.
        Am J Otol. 1992; 13: 97-107
        • Neely J.G.
        • Wang K.X.
        • Shapland C.A.
        • et al.
        Computerized objective measurement of facial motion: normal variation and test-retest reliability.
        Otol Neurotol. 2010; 31: 1488-1492
        • Meier-Gallati V.
        • Scriba H.
        • Fisch U.
        Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (Oscar).
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 118: 545-550
        • He S.
        • Soraghan J.J.
        • O'Reilly B.F.
        • et al.
        Quantitative analysis of facial paralysis using local binary patterns in biomedical videos.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 56: 1864-1870
        • Kecskés G.
        • Jóri J.
        • O'Reilly B.F.
        • et al.
        Clinical assessment of a new computerised objective method of measuring facial palsy.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2011; 36: 313-319
        • Byrne P.J.
        • Kim M.
        • Boahene K.
        • et al.
        Temporalis tendon transfer as part of a comprehensive approach to facial reanimation.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007; 9: 234-241
        • Sidle D.M.
        • Fishman A.J.
        Modification of the orthodromic temporalis tendon transfer technique for reanimation of the paralyzed face.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145: 18-23
        • Bray D.
        • Henstrom D.K.
        • Cheney M.L.
        • et al.
        Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010; 12: 352-354
      1. Griffin GR, Abuzeid W, Vainshtein J, et al: Outcomes following temporalis tendon transfer in irradiated patients. Arch Facial Plastic Surg (in press)

        • Frey M.
        • Jenny A.
        • Giovanoli P.
        • et al.
        Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction in the face.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93: 1334-1349
        • Johnson P.C.
        • Brown H.
        • Kuzon Jr, W.M.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 171-179
        • Hays R.D.
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        • Mazel R.M.
        The rand 36-item health survey 1.0.
        Health Econ. 1993; 2: 217-227
        • Robinson K.
        • Gatehouse S.
        • Browning G.G.
        Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996; 105: 415-422
        • Harris D.L.
        • Carr A.T.
        The Derriford appearance scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2001; 54: 216-222
        • VanSwearingen J.M.
        • Brach J.S.
        The facial disability index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system.
        Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1288-1300
        • Kahn J.B.
        • Gliklich R.E.
        • Boyev K.P.
        • et al.
        Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale.
        Laryngoscope. 2001; 111: 387-398
        • Mehta R.P.
        • WernickRobinson M.
        • Hadlock T.A.
        Validation of the synkinesis assessment questionnaire.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 923-926
        • Stewart M.G.
        • Witsell D.L.
        • Smith T.L.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 157-163
        • Most S.P.
        Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006; 8: 306-309
        • de Almeida J.R.
        • Alexander A.J.
        • Shrime M.G.
        • et al.
        Development and preliminary validation of the lip reanimation outcomes questionnaire.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 143: 361-366
        • Chu E.A.
        • Farrag T.Y.
        • Ishii L.E.
        • et al.
        Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model.
        Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 13: 14-19
        • Ishii L.E.
        • Godoy A.
        • Encarnacion C.O.
        • et al.
        What faces reveal: impaired affect display in facial paralysis.
        Laryngoscope. 2011; 121: 1138-1143