Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 28, ISSUE 2, P66-71, June 2017

Embryology and anatomy of the ear

Published:March 16, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2017.03.011
      External ear anomalies are common and range from mild asymmetries to severe deformity or complete lack of external ear development. An in-depth knowledge of the developmental stages and embryology allows for an understanding of patterns of ear malformation. Here we review the embryology of the ear as well as the anatomy of a normally formed ear as a preface for discussing reconstruction in future chapters of this issue.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Ear malformations are common and range from minor abnormalities to complete anotia (lack of an ear). Understanding the key steps in the embryologic development of the external ear is, therefore, critical to the understanding of various ear deformities. Although we briefly discuss embryology of the ear canal, the focus of this discussion is on external ear development.

      Embryology of the external ear

      In the development of the human ear, the branchial arches play a crucial role. They are separated by pouches composed of endoderm on the internal aspect and by clefts composed of ectoderm on the external side. The central mesoderm contains the muscle, cartilage, vessels and nerves that will ultimately supply and establish the surrounding anatomic structures (Figure 1). Molecular signaling from the ectoderm results in invasion of mesenchyme and gradual obliteration of the clefts and pouches. The importance of this mesenchymal invasion is highlighted by the fact that failure of this critical step leads to remnants of the brachial arches and clefts, resulting in various auricular anomalies. Type I branchial cleft cysts represent a persistence of the first branchial cleft.
      • Waldhausen J.H.T.
      Branchial cleft and arch anomalies in children.
      Additionally, some authors suggest that when there is an anomaly in the molecular signaling between the ectoderm and mesenchyme it can lead to failure of chondrogenesis. This breakdown of signaling can result in different degrees of anomalies, from absence of specific auricle components to microtia or even anotia if there is complete chondrogenesis failure.
      • Porter C.J.W.
      • Tan S.T.
      Congenital auricular anomalies: Topographic anatomy, embryology, classification and treatment strategies.
      • Cousley R.R.
      • Wilson D.J.
      Hemifacial macrosomia: Developmental consequence of perturbation of the auriculofacial cartilage model?.
      Figure 1
      Figure 1Branchial origins of the ear. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Development of the human ear begins with appearance of the otic placode and vestibulocochlear ganglia at 3 weeks of gestation. The external auditory canal begins to develop from the first branchial cleft at 4 weeks. A pit is then formed by ectodermal proliferation. By 28 weeks an epithelial core has canalized from medial to lateral resulting in the fully patent external auditory canal. When the external auditory meatus fails to canalize, it can result in membranous or bony stenosis or atresia.
      • Wareing M.J.
      • Lalwani A.K.
      • Anwar A.A.
      • et al.
      Development of the ear.
      Development of the auricle begins at 5 weeks gestation with development of the auricular hillocks numbered from 1 through 6, derived from the first (mandibular) and second (hyoid) branchial arches.
      • Wareing M.J.
      • Lalwani A.K.
      • Anwar A.A.
      • et al.
      Development of the ear.
      By the sixth week there are 6 mesenchymal thickenings at the dorsal margins of the first and second branchial arches.
      • Park C.
      • Roh T.S.
      Congenital upper auricular detachment.
      The first and sixth hillocks become more distinct before the remainder of the hillocks but all are defined by the end of week 6.
      • Wood-Jones F.
      • Wen I.C.
      The development of the external ear.
      Fusion of the hillocks results in formation of the auricle. It has been proposed that failure of these hillocks to fuse results in the formation of preauricular pits or sinuses and cleft ear (Figure 2).
      • Emery P.J.
      • Salaman N.Y.
      Congenital preauricular sinus: A study of 31 cases seen over a 10-year period.
      • Park C.
      • Roh T.S.
      Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation.
      An overview of embryonic ear development is highlighted in Table 1.
      Figure 2
      Figure 2Examples of 2 possible hillock fusion deformities. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Table 1Summary of fetal development of the external ear
      Week of developmentEmbryonic eventPossible malformation (s)
      3Development of otic placode
      Vestibulocochlear ganglia appear
      4Beginning of EAC development
      5First sign of auricular hillocks
      6Auricular hillocks fully distinct
      6-8Hillocks fuse to form auricular structureFailure of fusion: preauricular sinuses and pits; cleft ear deformities
      8Auricular structure evidentSignaling failure results in arrest of development: possible microtia or anotia
      Epithelial strand that will become EAC apparent
      9-18Migration of auricle components and continued development
      18Auricle has final form (not size)
      20Beginning of disintegration of external auditory meatal plugFailure of disintegration: EAC stenosis or atresia
      28EAC fully patent
      EAC, external auditory canal.
      The contributions of each hillock become less defined in the transitional zone between the mandibular and hyoid arches.
      • Park C.
      • Roh T.S.
      Congenital upper auricular detachment.
      Although it is mostly agreed upon that the hillocks can be followed through development to specific components of the auricle, this theory has been doubted by some who state the hillocks are transient, representing intense foci of mesenchymal proliferation, which do not directly give way to specific auricle components.
      • Porter C.J.W.
      • Tan S.T.
      Congenital auricular anomalies: Topographic anatomy, embryology, classification and treatment strategies.
      Specifically there is controversy regarding the developmental origin of the ascending helix and crus helicis. Over time the exact contributions of the each hillock to the auricle have been modified, starting with His in 1885. Park proposed that the pinna may develop from hillocks 1 and 6 based on his surveillance of ear clefting deformities.
      • Park C.
      Lower auricular malformations: Their representation, correction and embryologic correlation.
      An additional contribution to the auricular primordium is the free ear fold, which develops posterior to the second branchial arch and ultimately gives rise to part of the helix, scaphoid fossa, and to the superior crus of the antihelix.
      • Streeter G.L.
      Development of the auricle in the human embryo.
      Table 2 summarizes the proposed contributions of each hillock to the final auricle whereas Figure 3 illustrates these contributions throughout embryonic development.
      Table 2Contributions of the arches and hillocks to the human auricle
      Branchial archHillock numberEar component
      Arch 11Tragus
      Arch 12Crus helicis
      Arch 13Ascending helix
      Arch 24Horizontal helix, upper portion of scapha, and antihelix
      Arch 25Descending helix, middle scapha, and antihelix
      Arch 26Antitragus and inferior helix
      Figure 3
      Figure 3Numbered auricular hillocks and corresponding components of the fully developed auricle. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Finally, movement of the auricle within the human embryo was described in detail by Streeter.
      • Streeter G.L.
      Development of the auricle in the human embryo.
      During development, the external ear gradually moves laterally and dorsally and in the cranial direction relative to the eyes and mouth. Kagurasho et al
      • Kagurasho M.
      • Shigehito Y.
      • Uwabe C.
      • et al.
      Movement of the external ear in the human embryo.
      determined that movement of the ear during development is based on changes in size and shape of the embryo also known as differential growth, rather than on migration from one area to another.

      Anatomy

      The auricle plays a minor but important role in hearing. The auricle serves to help localize sound and the concha has a resonance of approximately 5 kHz.
      • Wareing M.J.
      • Lalwani A.K.
      • Anwar A.A.
      • et al.
      Development of the ear.
      As mentioned previously, during embryologic development the ear’s components are derived from the hillocks. The central mesenchyme is essential as it carries components leading to vascular, nerve, and muscular supply for the ear. The vascular supply of the ear is composed of a complex network of interconnected vessels stemming mainly from the superficial temporal artery and the posterior auricular artery
      • Park C.
      • Roh T.S.
      Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation.
      (Figure 4). There are variable branch patterns of upper, middle, and lower terminal branches of the superficial temporal artery that contribute to the anterior blood supply. Further anterior arterial contributions come from the perforating branches of the posterior auricular artery. Venous drainage is variable but most often originates from venae comitantes that accompany 1 of the 2 main arteries.
      Figure 4
      Figure 4Anterior and posterior arterial supply to the auricle. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Skin over the anterior and posterior surfaces differs mostly in its mobility with the posterior skin being quite mobile and the anterior skin tightly adherent to the underlying cartilage. The postauricular region contains a layer of connective tissue carrying blood vessels and nerves that separates the skin from the perichondrium. This becomes relevant when pursuing reconstructive options as one must consider the fascial layer in addition to the cutaneous layer.
      Sensory innervation of the auricle is variable as was demonstrated by Peuker and Filler.
      • Peuker E.T.
      • Filler T.J.
      The nerve supply of the human auricle.
      The lobule, antitragus, scapha, superior and inferior crurae, and posterior helix are almost uniformly innervated by the great auricular nerve. The great auricular nerve overlaps with the auriculotemporal nerve in most cases to provide innervation to the tragus. The auriculotemporal nerve is the predominant nerve supply for the anterior helix and the root of the helix. The auricular branch of the vagus nerve also provides innervation to the antihelix the majority of the time. However, the auricular branch of the vagus nerve has accessory innervation roles in the superior and inferior crurae and contributes to innervation of the middle and lower one-third of the cranial (posterior) surface. The final contribution comes from the lesser occipital nerve. The lesser occipital nerve contributes to the innervation of the upper third and middle third of the cranial surface. Common innervation is illustrated in Figure 5.
      Figure 5
      Figure 5Sensory innervation to the auricle is demonstrated earlier in the anterior (A) and posterior (B) views. The great auricular nerve (GAN) auricular temporal nerve (ATN) and auricular branch of the vagus nerve dominate anterior innervation. There is overlap between the ATN and GAN along the antihelix, tragus, triangular fossa, and superior and inferior crura as demonstrated by the dots of color. Additional dots of color demonstrate the variable contribution of the facial nerve to the concha, which is mostly innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerves (ABVN). The dominant posterior innervation is from the GAN and the lesser occipital nerve (LON). There are overlapping contributions from the ABVN. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      The topographic landmarks are important for creating the distinctive look of the human ear. Their names and relationships are important for describing anomalies and defects and must be considered during reconstruction. The most external portion of the auricle is the helix, which can further be divided into 4 sections: the root, anterior helix, superior helix, and posterior helix, depicted in Figure 6. At the inferior aspect of the helix is the lobule, the only part of the auricle that does not contain any cartilage but rather is made up of skin and fibrofatty tissue. Working from external to internal the next section of the auricle is the antihelix. The antihelix can be divided into 3 parts: the body, superior crus, and inferior crus. Inferiorly the body blends with the antitragus, which opposes the tragus and the root of the helix on the anterior portion of the auricle (Figure 6).
      Figure 6
      Figure 6Anterior and posterior surface anatomy of the auricle. Anterior (A) and posterior (B) anatomic landmarks of the auricle. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      The cartilaginous components of the anterior auricle consist of named depressions or fossae outlined by prominences. The scaphoid and triangular fossae are posterior and anterior to the superior crus of the antihelix, respectively. The middle fossa is the concha, which is divided into the concha cymba, superior to the root of the helix, and the concha cavum inferiorly. More inferiorly the intertragal notch is posterior to the tragus and anterior to the antitragus (Figure 6). On the posterior surface of the auricle are the scaphoid, triangular, and conchal eminences, whose names parallel the corresponding fossa on the anterior surface of the auricle. The superior and inferior crura on the anterior surface are complemented by the superior and inferior grooves on the posterior surface. The ponticulus, a vertical ridge which crosses the conchal eminence, can also be seen in approximately 66% of ears.
      • Holt J.J.
      The ponticulus: An anatomic study.
      The muscles of the auricle are divided into intrinsic and extrinsic (Figure 7). The 3 extrinsic muscles include the superior, anterior, and posterior auricularis muscles. The 6 intrinsic muscles are considered vestigial but may play a role in modifying the shape of the auricle. The intrinsic muscles include the helicis major and minor, tragicus, antitragicus, traversus auriculae, and obliquus auriculae. Details of the origins, insertions and innervations of the auricular muscles can be found in Table 3.
      Figure 7
      Figure 7Anterior and posterior view of the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles of the auricle. Anterior (A) and posterior (B) views of the muscles of the auricle. The auricularis anterior, superior ans posterior muscles are the extrinsic muscles of the auricle. The intrinsic muscles include the helicis major and minor, tragicus, antitragicus, traverus auriculae, and obliquus auriculae. All muscles of the auricle are innervated by the facial nerve. (Color version of figure is available online.)
      Table 3Muscles of the auricle
      MuscleOriginInsertionInnervationActionExtrinsic/intrinsic
      Auricularis anteriorGalea aponeurosisHelixCN VIIPulls ear forwardExtrinsic
      Auricularis posteriorMastoid processPosterior root of the earCN VIIPulls ear backwardExtrinsic
      Auricularis superiorGalea aponeurosisUpper posterior earCN VIIPulls ear upward and backwardExtrinsic
      Helicis majorRoot helixAnterior border helixCN VIINoneIntrinsic
      Helicis minorBase root of the helixAnterior helixCN VIIMay contribute to shape of anterior margin of earIntrinsic
      AntitragicusOuter antitragusTail of helix and antihelixCN VIIMay modify shape auricleIntrinsic
      TragicusBase tragusApex tragusCN VIIMay increase opening of EACIntrinsic
      Obliquus auriculaeConchal EminenceTriangular EminenceCN VIIFlattens AuricleIntrinsic
      Transversus auriculaeConchal eminenceScapha eminenceCN VIIFlattens auricleIntrinsic
      By 3 years of age, 85% of ear growth is complete and adult size is reached by 6 years of age.
      • da Silva Freitas R.
      • Sanchez M.E.R.
      • Manzotti M.S.
      • et al.
      Comparing cephaloauricular and scaphaconchal angles in prominent ear patients and control subjects.
      Overall, the average height of the adult auricle is approximately 58 mm for females and 62 mm for males. Projection of the auricle is defined as the distance from the posterior region of the middle helix to the mastoid skin and the normal range is 15-21 mm in both males and females.
      • da Silva Freitas R.
      • Sanchez M.E.R.
      • Manzotti M.S.
      • et al.
      Comparing cephaloauricular and scaphaconchal angles in prominent ear patients and control subjects.
      The scaphoconchal angle should be approximately 90° and the normal range of the cephaloauricular angle is defined as anywhere from 20°-35°.
      • da Silva Freitas R.
      • Sanchez M.E.R.
      • Manzotti M.S.
      • et al.
      Comparing cephaloauricular and scaphaconchal angles in prominent ear patients and control subjects.
      • Farkas L.G.
      Vertical and horizontal proportion of the face in young adult North American Caucasions: Revisions of neo-classical canons.

      Conclusions

      The ear develops in a predictable manner, with various alterations in development resulting in predictable deformities when the process is interrupted. Knowledge of auricular development as well as normal external anatomy allows for precise evaluation of the ear and assists in selecting appropriate reconstructive techniques to optimize the complex 3-dimensional anatomical outcomes that will be discussed in the following articles.

      Disclosures

      The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any concept discussed in this article.

      References

        • Waldhausen J.H.T.
        Branchial cleft and arch anomalies in children.
        Semin Pediatr Surg. 2006; 15: 64-69
        • Porter C.J.W.
        • Tan S.T.
        Congenital auricular anomalies: Topographic anatomy, embryology, classification and treatment strategies.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1701-1712
        • Cousley R.R.
        • Wilson D.J.
        Hemifacial macrosomia: Developmental consequence of perturbation of the auriculofacial cartilage model?.
        Am J Med Genet. 1992; 42: 461-466
        • Wareing M.J.
        • Lalwani A.K.
        • Anwar A.A.
        • et al.
        Development of the ear.
        in: Johnson J.T. Rosen C.A. Bailey B.J. Bailey’s Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (PA)2014
        • Park C.
        • Roh T.S.
        Congenital upper auricular detachment.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 488-490
        • Wood-Jones F.
        • Wen I.C.
        The development of the external ear.
        J Anat. 1933; 68: 525-533
        • Emery P.J.
        • Salaman N.Y.
        Congenital preauricular sinus: A study of 31 cases seen over a 10-year period.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1981; 3: 205-218
        • Park C.
        • Roh T.S.
        Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2002; 29: 155-174
        • Park C.
        Lower auricular malformations: Their representation, correction and embryologic correlation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 29-40
        • Streeter G.L.
        Development of the auricle in the human embryo.
        Carnegie Contrib Embryol. 1922; 14: 111-148
        • Kagurasho M.
        • Shigehito Y.
        • Uwabe C.
        • et al.
        Movement of the external ear in the human embryo.
        Head Face Med. 2012; 8: 1-9
        • Peuker E.T.
        • Filler T.J.
        The nerve supply of the human auricle.
        Clin Anat. 2002; 15: 35-37
        • Holt J.J.
        The ponticulus: An anatomic study.
        Otol Neurotol. 2005; 26: 1122-1124
        • da Silva Freitas R.
        • Sanchez M.E.R.
        • Manzotti M.S.
        • et al.
        Comparing cephaloauricular and scaphaconchal angles in prominent ear patients and control subjects.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; 32: 620-623
        • Farkas L.G.
        Vertical and horizontal proportion of the face in young adult North American Caucasions: Revisions of neo-classical canons.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 27: 446-453