Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 31, ISSUE 4, P283-288, December 2020

Skin Burns of the Head and Neck

  • Alexandra Shams Ortiz
    Affiliations
    Department of Otolaryngology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas
    Search for articles by this author
  • Rodney K. Chan
    Affiliations
    Dental and Craniofacial Trauma Research Department, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gregory R. Dion
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests and correspondence: Gregory R. Dion, MD, Dental and Craniofacial Trauma Research Department, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Bldg 3611, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234-7313.
    Affiliations
    Department of Otolaryngology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas

    Dental and Craniofacial Trauma Research Department, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 09, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2020.10.004
      Burns of the face and neck are devastating injuries with significant psychological and functional morbidity. A detailed understanding of the severity of head and neck burns is key to effective acute management of these injuries and prevention of long-term complications. This article focuses on acute management of burns of the face and skin both in the inpatient setting and managing the sequelae of facial burns including hypertrophic scarring, contractures, and functional issues such as microstomia and ectropion.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Burns account for 300,000 annual deaths with 11 million people a year requiring medical care for burn injuries.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      ,
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      Though the mortality associated with burns has decreased in recent decades due to advances in intensive burn management, burns still cause significant morbidity.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      Burns to the face and neck are particularly devastating injuries and can cause both profound functional and psychological morbidity. The incidence of facial burns varies widely in the literature from 6% to 60% of all burns
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      with a recent retrospective review from Portugal reporting that 47% of patients admitted to their burn unit had face or neck burns.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      The vast majority of these burns occur from accidental exposure to flames or scald injuries.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      ,
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.

      Defining Burns

      Total Body Surface Area

      Burns are defined by depth of soft tissue injury and the total body surface area (TBSA) that is affected. TBSA is estimated clinically and is important for determining fluid resuscitation and nutrition requirements in burn patients. A common method of estimating TBSA is the Wallace Rule of Nines.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      This tool assigns percentages of body surface area to different parts of the body. The head and neck account for a total of 9% of TBSA in adults, with 4.5% assigned to the anterior face and neck and 4.5% assigned to the scalp and posterior neck.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      ,
      • Mance M
      • Prutki M
      • Dujmovic A
      • et al.
      Changes in total body surface area and the distribution of skin surfaces in relation to body mass index.
      Additionally, Lund-Browder charts (Figure 1) are used to measure TBSA as well as the palm method or newer methods relying on smartphone technology.
      • Kamolz LP
      • Lumenta DB
      • Parvizi D
      • et al.
      Smartphones and burn size estimation: "Rapid Burn Assessor.
      ,
      • Rossiter ND
      • Chapman P
      • Haywood IA
      How big is a hand?.
      Figure 1
      Figure 1Lund-Browder chart for measuring surface burn areas.

      Burn Depth

      Burn depth is essential in classifying the severity of burn injuries and guides treatment in most cases. Depth is generally classified into 4 categories based on the tissue layers that have been damaged (Figure 2). Superficial burns are characterized by damage to the epidermis with clinical presentation notable for pain and erythema of the affected area. The epidermis regenerates over a period of a few days, and there is no substantial scarring appreciated. Superficial partial thickness burns extend down into the papillary dermis and cause pain, erythema, and blistering of the skin. Capillary refill remains intact and the skin re-epithelializes in 7-21 days with a likely return to full function of the burned tissue. Deep partial thickness burns extend to the reticular dermis, destroying blood vessels, nerves, and adnexal structures of the affected areas. As a result, there is no capillary refill and the skin is insensate. The skin is a pale color and may appear blistered. The skin may re-epithelialize over 21-60 days without intervention, but the risk of scar and decreased function of the tissue is common. Full thickness burns involve the layers deep to the skin including subcutaneous fat, muscle, or bone. These burns are insensate and have a leathery or gray appearance and generally do not blister. These burns do not have potential for regeneration because all of the adnexal structures are destroyed and are likely to have functional limitations and extensive scarring.
      • Monafo WW.
      Initial management of burns.
      In a 15-year retrospective review of 205 patients with facial burns admitted to a burn center, 80% of burns were superficial partial thickness, 12% were deep partial thickness, and 6% were full thickness injuries.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      Figure 2
      Figure 2Illustration of burn depth and tissue layers.
      Burn depth is often assessed clinically, but this is an imperfect mechanism that may evolve over the course of the first few days. Many other methods for assessing burn depth have been investigated including thermal imaging and laser Doppler imaging, but these techniques all have limitations in terms of accuracy and required equipment. As result, simple clinical assessment remains the most common tools for estimating burn depth.
      • Monstrey S
      • Hoeksema H
      • Verbelen J
      • et al.
      Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential.

      Initial Assessment

      Airway

      Initial management of burns to the face and neck revolves around airway stabilization because of the risks of upper airway edema and smoke inhalation injury.
      • Costa Santos D
      • Barros F
      • Frazao M
      • et al.
      Pre-burn centre management of the airway in patients with face burns.
      The assessment for intubation is important in the initial evaluation both in the field and on arrival to the emergency room or burn center. A retrospective review recently examined the airway management of 284 patients with facial and neck burns. They found that 38% of these patients arrived at the burn center intubated, with 75% of the intubations occurring in field and the other 25% in ED for concern of inhalation injury. Of these patients who arrive intubated, however, only 23% had confirmed airway burns on bronchoscopy.
      • Costa Santos D
      • Barros F
      • Frazao M
      • et al.
      Pre-burn centre management of the airway in patients with face burns.
      Often the intubations in the field were performed for indications of soot in the oropharynx or nasopharynx or singed nasal hairs, which may not be good predictors of true airway edema.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      Other retrospective data suggest that isolated physical exam findings of singed nasal hairs, carbonaceous sputum, and facial burns are poor predictors of smoke inhalation injury.
      • Ching JA
      • Shah JL
      • Doran CJ
      • et al.
      The evaluation of physical exam findings in patients assessed for suspected burn inhalation injury.
      Though there are not strict intubation guidelines in the burn setting, several burn centers use criteria that include: respiratory failure, >20% TBSA burns for pain control, partial of full thickness burns involving the entire face and neck, and symptoms of laryngeal edema like stridor or hoarse voice.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      ,
      • Monafo WW.
      Initial management of burns.
      It is important to note that care must be taken to secure the endotracheal tube in a way to minimize pressure on burned tissue in the case of facial burns.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      This may include frequent adjustment of strap or attempting to minimize pressure on burned tissue.

      Treatment

      Topical Treatments and Debridement

      After the airway evaluation has been completed, the initial treatment of face and neck burns involves local wound care with gentle debridement and topical antibiotics.
      • Monafo WW.
      Initial management of burns.
      ,
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      For superficial burns, these treatments are unnecessary because the epithelium regenerates rapidly and only symptomatic treatment is necessary.
      • Monafo WW.
      Initial management of burns.
      Given that the clinical assessment of burn depth may evolve over the first several days after injury, the decision for further surgical management is deferred until the wound has declared itself.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      ,
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      Bacitracin is a widely used antibiotic ointment in facial burns and ophthalmic bacitracin is required for periorbital burns. Ointment is removed and reapplied at least daily, and the removal of ointment provides a gentle debridement of the injured skin.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      ,
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      For deep partial thickness and full thickness burns, 1% silver sulfadiazine is an antimicrobial that is often used to prevent wound desiccation. The use of silver sulfadiazine is somewhat controversial with some centers
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      arguing for its routine use in areas like the ears to prevent chondritis, while other centers avoid the medication on the face completely because they believe it inhibits re-epithelialization.
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.

      Surgical Excision

      Conservative management of facial and neck burns is continued for 5-10 days while the patient is systemically stabilized. The need and timing of surgical intervention is variable between institutions, but approximately 10%-20% of all patients with head and neck burns will require surgical intervention.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      ,
      • Hamilton TJ
      • Patterson J
      • Williams RY
      • et al.
      Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
      In a large epidemiologic review from the Netherlands, the burned areas more likely to require surgery included the scalp, ears, and ventral neck.
      • Hoogewerf CJ
      • van Baar ME
      • Hop MJ
      • et al.
      Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
      For full thickness burns, surgical intervention is typically required after this initial period as the skin has no ability to regenerate.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.

      Technique

      Surgery for facial and neck burns involves tangential excision of nonvital tissue and grafting burned areas.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      Excision can be difficult because of the complex contours of the face, and there are many methods employed to achieve adequate and even excision of tissue. Sharp excision using a flat goulian knife is a classic method for flat surfaces of the head and neck with scalpel and sharp scissors used for tighter areas. Hydrodebridement using tools such as the VersaJet hydrosurgery system are effect on concave and areas and complex 3-dimensional structures like the ears and nose.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      The VersaJet system (Figure 3) uses a stream of sterile saline under high pressure to perform precise tangential debridement, and there have been several studies that have found this tool to be extremely effective for use in the head and neck.
      • Duteille F
      • Perrot P.
      Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet((R)) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: A prospective evaluation of 20 cases.
      ,
      • Klein MB
      • Hunter S
      • Heimbach DM
      • et al.
      The Versajet water dissector: A new tool for tangential excision.
      Grafting is then performed over the debrided areas with either allograft or autograft materials. The most common donor sites for autografting of the face are scalp, neck, supraclavicular regions, and inner arms or thighs.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      Generally split thickness skin grafting is used for the face and neck, with the exception of the upper and lower eyelids, which require full thickness skin grafts. Preferred donor sites for full thickness skin grafts for the eyelid skin are the inner arms as they provide a comparable match in skin thickness. Allograft materials such as Integra or Alloderm may also be used for partial or full thickness injuries. These allograft options are biosynthetic dressings that provide a scaffold for the formation of new dermis. The decision of whether to used autograft or allograft materials depends in part on the TBSA of burns and whether there is sufficient donor graft material available.
      • Cole JK
      • Engrav LH
      • Heimbach DM
      • et al.
      Early excision and grafting of face and neck burns in patients over 20 years.
      Many centers will elect to perform allografting at the time of initial excision and will reserve skin grafting for areas that have not healed when the allograft materials are removed.
      • Duteille F
      • Perrot P.
      Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet((R)) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: A prospective evaluation of 20 cases.
      ,
      • Cole JK
      • Engrav LH
      • Heimbach DM
      • et al.
      Early excision and grafting of face and neck burns in patients over 20 years.
      Figure 3
      Figure 3Illustration of Versajet head allowing for tissue preserving debridement.

      Partial Thickness Burns

      Though it is widely accepted that full thickness burns typically require surgical intervention, there is significant debate regarding the management and timing of surgery for superficial and deep partial thickness burns. Some centers favor conservative management of partial thickness burns for up 14-21 days in order to allow superficial burns to heal and minimize the amount of tissue that will require excision and grafting.
      • Tenenhaus M
      • Bhavsar D
      • Rennekampff HO
      Treatment of deep partial thickness and indeterminate depth facial burn wounds with water-jet debridement and a biosynthetic dressing.
      Others recommend early excision and grafting for partial thickness burns at 6-10 days to reduce the risk of hypertrophic scarring which can cause long-term complications of scar contracture and decreased function.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      ,
      • Duteille F
      • Perrot P.
      Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet((R)) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: A prospective evaluation of 20 cases.
      Those who favor early excision also argue that this method decreases the risk of local wound infection. There is no high-quality evidence to guide the decision on timing of surgery.
      • Cole JK
      • Engrav LH
      • Heimbach DM
      • et al.
      Early excision and grafting of face and neck burns in patients over 20 years.

      Long-Term Reconstruction

      Secondary reconstructive surgeries for burns of the head and neck are generally deferred for 12 months following the initial injury.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      This allows time for burn scar to fully mature and the effects of the previous interventions to be appreciated. An exception to this rule is the eyelid, which may be grafted earlier than 6 months after injury because of the importance of protecting the eye. Management of secondary reconstruction centers around improving function and appearance of burned areas and may involve scar contracture release, further skin grafting, and even free flap reconstruction of large burned areas.

      Complications

      The goal in acute and long-term management of head and neck burns is to minimize complications that can affect not only a patient's functional status but also their psychological health. Hypertrophic scarring and wound contracture are the main long-term complications following head and neck burns and can affect all the functional structures in the area including the ears, nose, mouth, and eyes. The following discussions will discuss some of the most frequent and debilitating complications of head and neck burns.

      Neck Contracture

      Neck contracture is a frequent and potentially debilitating complication of neck burns (Figure 4). Contracture and hypertrophic scarring can cause decreased range of motion of the neck and head as well as difficulty swallowing and function of the lower portion of the face.
      • Mody NB
      • Bankar SS
      • Patil A
      Post burn contracture neck: Clinical profile and management.
      Neck contracture is in part related to positioning during the initial inpatient stay. Patients who are intubated or undergo tracheostomy during their admission are significantly more likely to have neck contracture because of limitations in movement required by the advanced airway management. Additionally, patients with upper extremity burns are more prone to neck contracture because their arms are kept in abduction to preserve shoulder range of motion. This shortens the neck and can lead to scarring.
      • Sharp PA
      • Dougherty ME
      • Kagan RJ
      The effect of positioning devices and pressure therapy on outcome after full-thickness burns of the neck.
      In the acute setting, positioning the neck in hyperextension and performing frequent neck range of motion exercises with physical therapy decreases the likelihood of neck contracture.
      • Sharp PA
      • Dougherty ME
      • Kagan RJ
      The effect of positioning devices and pressure therapy on outcome after full-thickness burns of the neck.
      Patients with long-term contracture and decreased range of motion not improved with physical therapy often require delayed reconstruction with scar release with the option for skin grafting, local flap, or regional/free flap reconstruction depending on the area of the contracted skin.
      • Mody NB
      • Bankar SS
      • Patil A
      Post burn contracture neck: Clinical profile and management.
      Figure 4
      Figure 4(A) Preoperative neck contractures. (B) Postoperative neck following contracture release and skin grafting.

      Microstomia

      Orofacial contracture resulting in microstomia is a risk in perioral burns (Figure 5). This can cause significant functional and cosmetic morbidity including dysphagia, poor articulation, poor mouth opening for intubation, oral incompetence, and distorted expression.
      • Clayton NA
      • Ward EC
      • Maitz PK
      Intensive swallowing and orofacial contracture rehabilitation after severe burn: A pilot study and literature review.
      Preventing this complication begins on initial admission to the burn unit and may involve physical therapy and splinting. A prospective cohort study of 229 patients undergoing comprehensive orofacial contracture management with mouth opening exercises and splinting showed that patients had significant improvement in vertical and horizontal mouth opening during the course of their treatment.
      • Clayton NA
      • Ward EC
      • Maitz PK
      Intensive swallowing and orofacial contracture rehabilitation after severe burn: A pilot study and literature review.
      If perioral contracture is not managed in the initial setting, the resultant microstomia is challenging to address surgically and requires excision and grafting which typically does not produce a favorable cosmetic outcome.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      Figure 5
      Figure 5Perioral burns with resulting microstomia.

      Ectropion

      Cicatricial ectropion is a very common complication in patients sustaining periorbital burns (Figure 6). Scarring of the eyelids can lead to ocular complications including corneal ulceration, exposure keratitis, and epiphora.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      Conservative measures to prevent ectropion are limited, but keeping the eyes moist using ointments, using moisture devices or tarsorrhaphies to minimize exposure can prevent ocular damage.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      Early scar release and skin grafting with full thickness skin grafts is recommended in the cases of eyelid contracture given the important role of protecting the eye.
      • Klein MB
      • Moore ML
      • Costa B
      • et al.
      Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
      Multiple procedures for scar release and skin grafting may be required to achieve a functional result because of the nature of the thin skin of the eyelids.
      • Griffin JE
      • Johnson DL.
      Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
      Figure 6
      Figure 6Patient with cicatricial ectropion of the right lower eyelid.

      Conclusion

      Skin burns of the head and neck are potentially devastating injuries that can have myriad long-term psychological and functional sequelae for the patient. The initial assessment of burns in this area involves airway evaluation and description of burn depth. Following several days to weeks of conservative management with topical ointments and bedside debridement, patients may require surgical intervention with excision and grafting for partial and full thickness burns. Though there is no strong evidence to guide the timing of surgical intervention, careful nursing care, physical therapy, and excision and grafting all play important roles in minimizing the common and morbid complications associated with hypertrophic scarring and contracture in the head and neck.

      Conflicts of Interest

      The authors reported no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

      References

        • Hoogewerf CJ
        • van Baar ME
        • Hop MJ
        • et al.
        Burns to the head and neck: Epidemiology and predictors of surgery.
        Burns. 2013; 39: 1184-1192
        • Hamilton TJ
        • Patterson J
        • Williams RY
        • et al.
        Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 76: 375-379
        • Griffin JE
        • Johnson DL.
        Management of the maxillofacial burn patient: Current therapy.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 247-252
        • Mance M
        • Prutki M
        • Dujmovic A
        • et al.
        Changes in total body surface area and the distribution of skin surfaces in relation to body mass index.
        Burns. 2020; 46: 868-875
        • Kamolz LP
        • Lumenta DB
        • Parvizi D
        • et al.
        Smartphones and burn size estimation: "Rapid Burn Assessor.
        Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2014; 27: 101-104
        • Rossiter ND
        • Chapman P
        • Haywood IA
        How big is a hand?.
        Burns. 1996; 22: 230-231
        • Monafo WW.
        Initial management of burns.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1581-1586
        • Monstrey S
        • Hoeksema H
        • Verbelen J
        • et al.
        Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential.
        Burns. 2008; 34: 761-769
        • Costa Santos D
        • Barros F
        • Frazao M
        • et al.
        Pre-burn centre management of the airway in patients with face burns.
        Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2015; 28: 259-263
        • Ching JA
        • Shah JL
        • Doran CJ
        • et al.
        The evaluation of physical exam findings in patients assessed for suspected burn inhalation injury.
        J Burn Care Res. 2015; 36: 197-202
        • Klein MB
        • Moore ML
        • Costa B
        • et al.
        Primer on the management of face burns at the University of Washington.
        J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005; 26: 2-6
        • Duteille F
        • Perrot P.
        Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet((R)) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: A prospective evaluation of 20 cases.
        Burns. 2012; 38: 724-729
        • Klein MB
        • Hunter S
        • Heimbach DM
        • et al.
        The Versajet water dissector: A new tool for tangential excision.
        J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005; 26: 483-487
        • Cole JK
        • Engrav LH
        • Heimbach DM
        • et al.
        Early excision and grafting of face and neck burns in patients over 20 years.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 1266-1273
        • Tenenhaus M
        • Bhavsar D
        • Rennekampff HO
        Treatment of deep partial thickness and indeterminate depth facial burn wounds with water-jet debridement and a biosynthetic dressing.
        Injury. 2007; 5: S39-S45
        • Mody NB
        • Bankar SS
        • Patil A
        Post burn contracture neck: Clinical profile and management.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: NC12-NC17
        • Sharp PA
        • Dougherty ME
        • Kagan RJ
        The effect of positioning devices and pressure therapy on outcome after full-thickness burns of the neck.
        J Burn Care Res. 2007; 28: 451-459
        • Clayton NA
        • Ward EC
        • Maitz PK
        Intensive swallowing and orofacial contracture rehabilitation after severe burn: A pilot study and literature review.
        Burns. 2017; 43: e7-e17