Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 1, P30-37, March 2023

Download started.

Ok

Feminizing mandibuloplasty

Published:January 31, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2023.01.005
      Compared to the typical female mandible, the adult male mandible tends to be wider, vertically taller, and has prominence of the angles. As these differences can affect gender perception, transwomen may achieve a smaller, tapered, and feminine lower jaw contour via feminizing mandibuloplasty. Modifications to the mandible and soft tissues are performed via an intraoral incision. Overall, this surgical procedure has a low risk of major complications and patients typically show high rates of postoperative satisfaction.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Roosenboom J
        • Indencleef K
        • Lee M
        • et al.
        SNPs associated with testosterone levels influence human facial morphology.
        Front Genet. 2018; 9: 497
        • Whitehouse A
        • Gilani S
        • Shafait F
        • et al.
        Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 28220151351
        • Grumbach M
        • Hughes I
        • Conte F.
        Disorders of sex differentiation.
        Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 10th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2003: 842-1002
        • Bulygina E
        • Mitteroecker P
        • Aiello L.
        Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population.
        Am J Phys Anthr. 2006; 131: 432-443
        • Fechner P.
        The biology of puberty: New developments in sex differences.
        Gender Differences at Puberty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2003: 17-28
        • Marečková K
        • Weinbrand Z
        • Chakravarty M
        • et al.
        Testosterone-mediated sex differences in the face shape during adolescence: Subjective impressions and objective features.
        Horm Behav. 2011; 60: 681-690https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.09.004
        • Verdonck A
        • Gaethofs M
        • Carels C
        • et al.
        Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty.
        Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21: 137-143https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.2.137
        • Indira A
        • Markande A
        • David M.
        Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study.
        J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4: 58-62
        • Vinay G
        • Gowri M
        • Anbalagan J.
        Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7: 2671-2673
        • Sairam V
        • Geethamalika M
        • Kumar P
        • et al.
        Determination of sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic radiograph.
        Contemp Clin Dent. 2016; 7: 434-439
        • Alias A
        • Ibrahim A
        • Abu Bakar S
        • et al.
        Anthropometric analysis of mandible: An important step for sex determination.
        Clin Ter. 2018; 169: e217-e223https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2018.2082
        • Albalawi A
        • Alam M
        • Vundavalli S
        • et al.
        Mandible: An indicator for sex determination - A three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.
        Contemp Clin Dent. 2019; 10: 69-73
        • Chou DW
        • Tejani N
        • Kleinberger A
        • et al.
        Initial facial feminization surgery experience in a multicenter integrated health care system.
        Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2020; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820924635
        • Baek SM
        • Kim S
        • Bindinger A.
        The prominent mandibular angle: Preoperative management, operative technique and results in 42 patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83: 272-280
        • Legg J.
        Enlargement of the temporal and masseter muscle on both sides.
        Trans Pathol Soc. 1980; 31: 361-366
        • Gurney C.
        Chronic bilateral benign hypertrophy of the masseter muscles.
        Am J Surg. 1947; 73: 137-139
        • Converse J.
        Deformity of the jaws.
        Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA1977: 1404
        • Jin H.
        Misconceptions about mandible reduction procedures.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005; 29: 317-324https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0111-8
        • Anic-Milosevic S
        • Mestrovic S
        • Prlić A
        • et al.
        Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
        J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 38: 90-95https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.013
        • Naini FB
        • Donaldson ANA
        • McDonald F
        • et al.
        Influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and clinician.
        Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 88-95https://doi.org/10.2319/050111-311.1
        • Kim JH
        • Han SJ
        • Kim MY.
        New method for an evaluation of the esthetical improvements resulting from a mandibular angle reduction.
        J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 43: 239-246https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.239
        • Lee Y
        • Han K
        • Kang J.
        Korean standards of craniomaxillofacial skeleton.
        J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 21: 438-451
        • Kim SK
        • Han JJ
        • Kim JT.
        Classification and treatment of prominent mandibular angle.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001; 25: 382-387https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010150
        • Chen H
        • Sun J
        • Wang J.
        Reducing prominent mandibular angle osteotomy complications: 10-year retrospective review.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 81 (Suppl 1): S5-S9https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001372
        • Morrison SD
        • Satterwhite T.
        Lower jaw recontouring in facial gender-affirming surgery.
        Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2019; 27: 233-242https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2019.01.001
        • Lee J
        • Lee S.
        Facial contouring surgery-mandibuloplasty: Genioplasty and mandible angle correction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1296https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001296
        • Ousterhout DK.
        Sliding genioplasty, avoiding mental nerve injuries.
        J Craniofac Surg. 1996; 7: 297-298https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199607000-00009
        • Davis CM
        • Gregoire CE
        • Davis I
        • et al.
        Prevalence of surgical site infections following orthognathic surgery: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial on a 3-day versus 1-day postoperative antibiotic regimen.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75: 796-804https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.038
        • Lindeboom JAH
        • Baas EM
        • Kroon FHM.
        Prophylactic single-dose administration of 600 mg clindamycin versus 4-time administration of 600 mg clindamycin in orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized study in bilateral mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomies.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95: 145-149https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.54
        • Chou DW
        • Block-Wheeler NR
        • Kshirsagar R
        • et al.
        Postoperative pain and opioid use after facial feminization surgery.
        Facial Plast Surg. 2021; 38: 240-244https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735648
        • Kang M.
        Incidence of complications associated with mandibuloplasty: A review of 588 cases over 5 years.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014; 2: e139https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000090
        • Lai C
        • Jin X
        • Zong X
        • et al.
        En-bloc u-shaped osteotomy of the mandible and chin for the correction of a prominent mandibular angle with long chin.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30: 1359-1363https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005126
        • Chow LK
        • Singh B
        • Chiu WK
        • et al.
        Prevalence of postoperative complications after orthognathic surgery: A 15-year review.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 984-992https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.07.006
        • Kanke K
        • Abe T
        • Abe M
        • et al.
        In-hospital surgical treatment for hemorrhage after aesthetic mandibular osteotomy performed as an office-based day surgery: A case report.
        Ann Med Surg 2012. 2017; 24: 15-18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.10.001
        • Wu G
        • Xie M
        • Hu C
        • et al.
        Cephalometric analysis of modifications of the mandible due to reduction mandibuloplasty in patients with prominent mandibular angle.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28: 654-658https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003446
        • Choi BK
        • Goh RCW
        • Moaveni Z
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction after zygoma and mandible reduction surgery: an outcome assessment.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 1260-1264https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.041
        • Zhou J
        • Qi Z
        • Jin X
        Simultaneous surgery for contouring the prominent zygoma and mandibular angles with facelift in middle-aged patients.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31: 448-452https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006227
        • Chou DW
        • Bruss D
        • Tejani N
        • et al.
        Quality of life outcomes after facial feminization surgery.
        Facial Plast Surg Aesthetic Med. 2022; 24 (Published): S44-S46https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0373